2004 UT App 57 - Moench v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2020
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Hill v. Lockhart · State v. Lopes · State v. Visser · State v. Maestas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to ensure that defendants have a complete understanding of the charge and of the constitutional rights they are waiving by entering a plea, [the Utah Supreme Court] created rule 11 of the Utah Rules of Criminal Procedure.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“not [be] limited to the record of the plea hearing but may look at the surrounding facts and cireumstances including the information [the defendant] received from his ... attorney[ ] before entering the plea.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a failure to comply with Utah's rule 11 does not in itself amount to a violation of a defendant's rights under either the Utah or the United States Constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.