2004 UT App 96 - State v. Hechtle’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Maryland v. Pringle · State v. Hansen · State v. Baity · State v. Warren
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“conclusions concerning drug use do not require a DRE so long as the officer involved is prudent, experienced, and trained and can employ proper technique in making the determination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“we afford little discretion to the [trial] court because there must be state-wide standards that guide law enforcement and prosecutorial officials.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. NIMER“[Tlo justify a warrantless arrest 'an officer must have probable cause ... to believe that the suspect has committed or is committing an offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Despain
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.