State v. Deilke’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
2 district · 28 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Santobello v. New York · Burgett v. Texas · Custis v. United States · 131 Wis. 2d 246 - State v. Bangert · 113 Wis. 2d 550 - Hansen v. AH Robins, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A material and substantial breach of a plea agreement is one that violates the terms of the agreement and defeats a benefit for the non-breaching party.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“examin[ing] all of the circumstances [and] considering both the defendant's and State's interests.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[Collateral attack. .. prevented the State from receiving all it bargained for when it dismissed multiple charges in exchange for one . . . conviction .... [A] party to a plea agreement cannot do an 'end run' around the plea agreement and . . . accomplish by indirect means what could not be done by direct means.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bembenek
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.