Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 WI 15 - State v. Kyles

State v. Kyles’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
4
states following
February 2022
most recently cited

46 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently February 2022 · most notably State v. Kramer (2009), State v. Post (2007)

46 state decisions

290200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Whren v. United States · United States v. Arvizu · United States v. Knights · Richards v. Wisconsin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he search of the passenger compartment of an automobile, limited to those areas in which a weapon may be placed or hidden, is permissible if the police officer possesses a reasonable belief based on "specific and articulable facts which, taken together with the rational inferences from those facts, reasonably warrant" the officer[] in believing that the suspect is dangerous and the suspect may gain immediate control of weapons.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'would be warranted in the belief that his safety and that of others was in danger 1 because the individual may be armed with a weapon and dangerous.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[I]n determining whether the officer acted reasonably in such circumstances, due weight must be given, not to [the officer's] inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or 'hunch,' but to the specific reasonable inferences which he [or she] is entitled to draw from the facts in light of his [or her] experience.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.