State v. Lagundoye’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
26 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently October 2020 · most notably Luurtsema v. Commissioner of Correction (2011), State v. Negrete (2012)
26 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · Teague v. Lane · McCarthy v. United States · Bailey v. United States · Hanna v. Plumer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“new rules of criminal procedure are to be applied retroactively to all cases pending on direct review or non-finalized cases still in the direct appeal pipeline.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[A] new rule of substantive criminal law is presumptively applied retroactively to all cases, whether on direct appeal or on collateral review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[W]hen a constitutional rule qualifies as 'new,' it will apply retroactively in only two instances: '(1) if the rule establishes that it is unconstitutional to proscribe certain conduct as criminal or to impose a type of punishment on certain defendants because of their status or offense; or (2) if it establishes a procedure without which the likelihood of an accurate conviction is seriously diminished.' Therefore, on collateral review ..., if a rule is not new, it applies retroactively; if it is new, but not a constitutional rule, it does not apply retroactively; and if it is new and constitutional, then it applies retroactively only if it falls within one of [the] delineated exceptions.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Robertson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.