Panzer v. Doyle’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably State v. Dubose (2005), Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. Companies (2006)
6 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1151 (Indian Crimes Act of 1976) · 18 U.S.C. § 1162 · 25 U.S.C. § 2701 (§ 2 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988) · 25 U.S.C. § 2702 (§ 3 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988) · 25 U.S.C. § 2710 (§ 11 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988) · 25 U.S.C. § 2719 (§ 20 of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988) · 28 U.S.C. § 1360 · 9 U.S.C. § 10 (Federal Arbitration Act)
Relies on Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida · Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez · Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer · Allied Structural Steel Company v. Spannaus · Printz v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“normally review[s] both the nature of delegated power and the presence of adequate procedural safeguards, giving less emphasis to the former when the latter is present.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[o]ur state constitution . . . created three branches of government, each with distinct functions and powers,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[n]o money shall be paid out of the treasury except in pursuance of an appropriation by law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.