State v. Greve’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently October 2023 · most notably 217 Ill. 2d 407 - People v. Patterson (2005), State v. Knapp (2005)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Hill v. United States · State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County · Green v. United States · Taylor v. Hayes
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“is to determine what the statute means so that it may be given its full, proper, and intended effect.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“shall be confidential and shall not be made available to any 12 Jeffrey H. Bergman, Comment, Insuring the Accuracy of the Presentence Investigation Report in the Wisconsin Correctional System, 1986 Wis. L. Rev. 613 , 613 (footnote omitted). 13 The exceptions to the general confidentiality rule, which do not require court approval to access and use the PSI, are listed in Wis. Stat. § 972.15 (5) and (6). The DOC is the most significant exception. 13 No. 2011AP1770-CR & 2011AP1771-CR person except upon specific authorization of the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“may be unverified and some of it may be inaccurate. . . . [A]ffording the defendant and defendant's counsel an opportunity to examine the contents of the report permits the defendant to challenge statements and correct errors.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.