State v. Faust’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
28 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Johnson v. United States · Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San Francisco · Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn. · Preston v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Subject to a few well-delineated exceptions, warrantless searches are deemed per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“touchstone of the Fourth Amendment is reasonableness.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“a showing by those who seek exemption . . . that the exigencies of the situation made that course imperative.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.