State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 2010
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738 · 28 U.S.C. § 1738A
Relies on United States v. Gaudin · Lockhart v. Nelson · 153 Wis. 2d 493 - State v. Poellinger · Martindale v. Ripp · State v. Harvey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“require criminal convictions to rest upon a jury determination that the defendant is guilty of every element of the crime with which he is charged, beyond a reasonable doubt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Smith
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.