Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 WIAPP 211 - State v. Lewis

State v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Gross v. Hoffman · State v. Hahn · State v. Piddington · 70 Wis. 2d 760 - Mulvaney v. Tri State Truck & Auto Body, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[o]nce the district attorney receives the [defendant's] request [for a prompt disposition under the IDA], the responsibility for prompt disposition is placed squarely on the district attorney.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[w]aiver of a statutory right must be an intentional and voluntary relinquishment of a known right, and it must be accomplished by a clear and specific renunciation of that right.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “acquiesced to the rescheduled trial date only after the prosecutor indicated, incorrectly, that no request for prompt disposition had been filed,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.