State v. Swiams’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
44 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County · State v. Gallion · 70 Wis. 2d 280 - Rosado v. State · 63 Wis. 2d 109 - Prue v. State · 175 Wis. 2d 653 - State v. Echols
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(am) If a person released to extended supervision under this section violates a condition of extended supervision, the reviewing authority may revoke the extended supervision of the person. If the extended supervision of the person is revoked, the person shall be returned to the circuit court for the county in which the person was convicted of the offense for which he or she was on extended supervision, and the court shall order the person to be returned to prison for any specified period of time that does not exceed the time remaining on the bifurcated sentence. The time remaining on the bifurcated sentence is the total length of the bifurcated sentence, less time served by the person in confinement under the sentence before release to extended supervision under sub. (2) and less all time served in confinement for previous revocations of extended supervision under the sentence. The court order returning a person to prison under this paragraph shall provide the person whose extended supervision was revoked with credit in accordance with ss. 304.072 and 973.155. (at) When a person is returned to court under par. (am) after revocation of extended supervision, the reviewing authority shall make a recommendation to the court concerning the period of time for which the person should be returned to prison. The recommended time period may not exceed the time remaining on the bifurcated sentence, as calculated under par. (am).”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Presley · State v. Harris“[w]e assume that the legislature's intent is expressed in the statutory language.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“In light of the need for meaningful assessment of decisions that deprive persons of their liberty ... we perceive no reason why a 'sentencing' under Wis. Stat. Rule 809.30 should not encompass reconfinement under Wis. Stat. § 302.13 (9)(am)(2001-02).”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Presley · State v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.