Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 WIAPP 40 - Van Erden v. Sobczak

Van Erden v. Sobczak’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
January 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 136 Wis. 2d 304 - Green Spring Farms v. Kersten · 113 Wis. 2d 112 - In Re Cherokee Park Plat · Folkman v. Quamme · 162 Wis. 2d 883 - State v. Martin · Badger Mutual Insurance v. Schmitz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The limits of this coverage will be reduced by: .... 3. A payment made or amount payable because of bodily injury under any workers' compensation or disability benefits law or any similar law.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “catchall phrase for jurisdictions that may call their disability benefits law by another name.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “may provide that the limits under the policy for uninsured or underinsured motorist coverage for bodily injury or death resulting from any one accident shall be reduced by . . . [a]mounts paid by or on behalf of any person or organization that may be legally responsible for the bodily injury or death for which the payment is made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.