Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 WIAPP 49 - State v. Thurmond

State v. Thurmond’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
4
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gross v. Hoffman · 128 Wis. 2d 110 - State v. Holt · 196 Wis. 2d 817 - State v. Rogers · Nommensen v. American Continental Insurance · State v. Koller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when it appeared likely that the jury saw the belated instructions as a court recommendation to convict; when the timing of the instructions makes the new instruction appear overly significant, upsetting the orderly process of the trial and upsetting the defendant’s right to a fair trial; when the defendant’s presentation of his case is harmed; and when circumstances suggest the verdict was driven by a stalled jury’s desire to disband rather than complete a fair assessment of the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.