Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 WY 101 - Giles v. State

Giles v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
March 2023
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently March 2023 · most notably Guy v. State (2008), Farmer v. State (2005)

1 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

140200420102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 232 Cal. App. 2d 650 - People v. Beaugez · Sorenson v. State · Olsen v. State · Anderson v. State · Keats v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “immodest, immoral or indecent liberties.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"* * * * when we take into consideration that the purpose of the act was to protect the morals of the child, that the Legislature employed apt words to describe the offense, because it is evident that the acts constituting the offense mean such as the common sense of society would regard as indecent and improper. People v. Hicks, 98 Mich. 86 , 56 N.W. 1102 . True, what shall be regarded as `immodest, immoral and indecent liberties' is not specified with particularity, but that is not necessary. The indelicacy of the subject forbids it. The common sense of the community, as well as the sense of decency, propriety, and morality which people generally entertain, is sufficient to apply the statute to each particular case, and point out unmistakably what particular conduct is rendered criminal by it. State v. Millard, 18 Vt. 574 , 46 Am.Dec. 170. * * * *" Dekelt v. People, 44 Colo. 525 , 99 P. 330 , 331-332 (1909)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he doctrine of stare decisis demands respect. But the underlying principle of our system of justice is justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.