Campbell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably O'BOYLE v. State (2005), Dixon v. State (2019)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Florida v. Royer · Brown v. Illinois · United States v. Soto · United States v. Fernandez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An investigative detention must be temporary, lasting no longer than necessary to effectuate the purpose of the stop, and the seope of the detention must be carefully tailored to its underlying justification. During a routine traffic stop, a law enforcement officer may request the driver's proof of insurance, operating license, and vehicle registration, run a computer check, and issue a citation or warning. The officer may detain the driver and his vehicle only for the period of time reasonably nee-essary to complete these routine matters. Onee the driver has produced a valid driver's license and proof that he is entitled to operate the vehicle, he must be allowed to proceed without further delay. During the stop, an officer generally may not ask the detained motorist questions unrelated to the purpose of the stop, including questions about controlled substances, unless the officer has reasonable suspicion of other ilegal activities.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Hembree v. State · Frazier v. State“'reasonably related in scope to the cireumstances that justified the interference in the first instance[?]T " O'Boyle v. State, 2005 WY 83, ¶ 46 , 117 P.3d 401, 414 (Wyo.2005), quoting Campbell v. State, 2004 WY 106, ¶ 11 , 97 P.3d 781, 784 (Wyo.2004). Mr. Batten focuses his argument on the second part of the Terry analysis, presumably because the trooper was justified in stopping him for the broken headlight. [T11l]l "[An investigative detention must be temporary, lasting no longer than necessary to effectuate the purpose of the stop, and the seope of the detention must be carefully tailored to its underlying justification.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“'reasonably related in scope to the cireumstances that justified the interference in the first instance[?]T”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.