Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently December 2020
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Huddleston v. United States · Wilko v. Swan · Gibson v. United States · Lassen v. Arizona Ex Rel. Arizona Highway Department · United States v. Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“rulings on uncharged misconduct evidence are too important to be made in the heat and pressure of a trial, with the jury twiddling its thumbs in the next room.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[a limiting] instruction must inform the jury of the specific purpose for which they may consider the evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Foster v. State“the clarity with which the 'problem' has been articulated by this Court,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. Fennell v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.