Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 WY 161 - Kimble v. Ellis

Kimble v. Ellis’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cranston v. Cranston · 85 Wash. App. 311 - In Re the Marriage of Capetillo · Hammond v. Hammond · Erhart v. Evans · Davis v. Chadwick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Clhild support is for the benefit of the children, and that the custodial parent stands in the shoes of a trustee who administers the money for the exelusive benefit of the children based upon their needs and welfare. A child's right to adequate support cannot be bargained away by a contract between the parents regardless of the validity of the agreement between the parents themselves.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]e conclude that the right to obtain support is not waived by the custodial parent's inability to act, inaction, or acquiescence to the nonpayment of child support if an action is brought within the statute of limitations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the children's money administered in trust by [the custodial parent] for their benefit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.