Manes v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently February 2025 · most notably Doherty v. State (2006), Frederick v. State (2007)
28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mehring v. State · Gayler v. State · Christy v. State · DeLoge v. State · Griebel v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“However, when no objection is made concerning the consideration of a particular factor, review is necessarily confined to a search for plain error. Plain error, as we have often stated, occurs when the record clearly shows an error that transgressed a clear and unequivocal rule of law which adversely affected a substantial right.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Kelley v. State · Faubion v. State“Evidence of prior criminal activity is 'highly relevant to the sentencing decision' and may be considered by the sentencing court despite the fact that no prosecution or conviction may have resulted.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[A] sentencing decision cannot be based upon unreliable information, undocumented information, or inaccurate information.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.