Barch v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2022
16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Delaware v. Prouse · Pennsylvania v. Mimms · United States v. Hensley · Ohio v. Robinette
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there exists an objectively reasonable suspicion that criminal activity has occurred or is occurring.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dimino v. State · Sutton v. State“'reasonably related in scope to the cireumstances that justified the interference in the first instance[?]T”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[GJeneric nervousness is of little significance in establishing reasonable suspicion because 'the average citizen is usually nervous when stopped by law enforcement for a routine traffic violation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Flood v. State · Feeney v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.