Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2004 WY 86 - WERCS v. Capshaw

WERCS v. Capshaw’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Yates v. Ball · Hiltgen v. Sumrall · Wilder v. Cody Country Chamber of Commerce · 152 Ill. App. 3d 269 - Payne v. Mill Race Inn · Dumas v. Auto Club Ins. Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"If it were otherwise, every employment contract would be affected and at-will employment would be turned on its head. Allowing performance in the form of employment, to act as a bar to the statute of frauds would render the relevant provision of the statute of frauds meaningless. Any contract where the employee had begun work and received a paycheck would be protected from the application of that statute." Wercs v. Capshaw , 94 P.3d 421 , 429 (Wyo. 2004) (Lehman, J., concurring).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “'it is generally held that the uncompleted part performance of an oral contract for employment, not to be performed within 1 year, does not take the contract out of the statute of frauds.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.