Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 ME 106 - State v. Bouchard

State v. Bouchard’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
August 2020
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2020

18 state decisions

100200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Michaud · State v. Turner · State v. Maier · Fitzgerald v. City of Bangor · State v. Poulin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n making that determination, the probation officer should consider any evidence that may be offered by [the defendant] as to how much of the [restitution amount] he used [for legitimate purposes] that would reduce the total amount of the [victim's] economic loss, and thus the amount of restitution to be paid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “remains for the Division of Probation and Parole to determine the actual amount that [the defendant] should be required to pay in restitution”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.