Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 ME 122 - Shaw v. Packard

Shaw v. Packard’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
June 2022
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2022

15 state decisions

80200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Farrell v. Theriault · State v. Mason · Landis v. Hannaford Bros. Co. · Christensen-Towne v. Dorey · Provenzano v. Deloge

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Any alleged error of the trial court that does not affect the substantial rights of a party is harmless and therefore must be disregarded.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.