Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 MT 107 - State v. Honey

State v. Honey’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
February 2010
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · State v. Lenihan · State v. Martinez · State v. Heath

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t appears to be the better rule to allow an appellate court to review any sentence imposed in a criminal case, if it is alleged that such sentence is illegal or exceeds statutory mandates, even if no objection is made at the time of sentencing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[E]ven if a defendant fails to contemporaneously object at sentencing, we will accept jurisdiction of an appeal that has been timely filed which alleges that a sentence is illegal or exceeds statutory authority.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “and inability to appreciate the nature of the custodial interrogation had caused him to involuntarily waive his Miranda rights. The State may not use confessions or admissions obtained through”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. In Re Sms

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.