State v. Cameron’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
34 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently November 2025 · most notably State v. Saucier (2007), State v. Cybulski (2009)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · 12 Cal. 4th 186 - People v. Barton · 119 Wash. 2d 401 - State v. Strauss · Fudge v. State · State v. Beavers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a) is established by proof of the same or less than all the facts required to establish the commission of the offense charged; (b) consists of an attempt to commit the offense charged or to commit an offense otherwise included in the offense charged; or (c) differs from the offense charged only in the respect that a less serious injury or risk to the same person, property, or public interest or a lesser kind of culpability suffices to establish its commission.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule, even though the declarant is available as a witness ... (2) Excited Utterance. A statement relating to a startling event or condition made while the declarant was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition. [Paragraph breaks omitted.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tony Notti v. State“‘Sexual contact” means touching of the sexual or other intimate parts of the person of another, directly or through clothing, in order to knowingly or purposely: (a) cause bodily injury to or humiliate, harass, or degrade another; or”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Gerstner
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.