Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 MT 82 - Peak Development, LLP v. Juntunen

Peak Development, LLP v. Juntunen’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
May 2011
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lords v. Newman · Blume v. Metropolitan Life Insurance · Karlen v. Evans · Bahm v. Southworth · Cribb v. Matlock Communications, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “gross neglect or actual misconduct by Juntunen's attorney are not issues here, as required under Rule 60(b)(6).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.