State v. Ochadleus’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently November 2021
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3109
Relies on Katz v. United States · Ker v. State of California · United States v. Place · Vandygriff v. Phillips · United States v. Jacobsen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When law enforcement officers contemplate a no-knock entry in executing a search warrant, that intention must be included in the application for the search warrant along with any foreknown exigent circumstances justifying the no-knock entry.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Neiss“an investigating officer may make a no-knock entry after a reasonable suspicion of exigency has ripened,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. State v. Neiss
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.