Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 ND 166 - Sayler v. State

Sayler v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 2007
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Heckelsmiller v. State · Damron v. State · Stoppleworth v. State · Mathre v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e review the record to decide if the assistance of counsel was plainly defective. Unless the record affirmatively shows ineffectiveness of constitutional dimensions, the complaining party must show some evidence in the record to support the claim. Representations and assertions of appellate counsel are not enough to establish a claim of ineffective assistance. To successfully claim ineffective assistance of counsel, a defendant must establish counsel’s representation fell below an objective standard of reasonableness and the defendant was prejudiced by counsel’s deficient performance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A defendant must offer evidence that any additional witnesses would have aided the defense's claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.