State v. Raulston’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2025
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Boykin v. Alabama · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · United States v. Rosa · Heckelsmiller v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“explained the minimum and maximum penalties of the underlying convictions and informed Raulston of the possible consequences of an admission. Raulston then admitted the probation condition violations without benefit of a plea agreement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sambursky v. State“[w]ho knows, you might be out back here in eight, nine months if you go through the process right.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sambursky v. State“akin to the failure to inform a criminal defendant of a mandatory minimum sentence. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sambursky v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.