Kaiser v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
August 2019
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Vandeberg v. State · Johnson v. State · State v. Steen · Eagleman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The state may move to dismiss an application on the ground that it is evident from the application that the applicant is not entitled to postconviction relief and no purpose would be served by any further proceedings. In considering the motion, the court shall take account of substance regardless of defects of form.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wong v. State“In Johnson, 2004 ND 130, ¶ 6 , 681 N.W.2d 769 , we “treated the district court’s decision as a dismissal of the application on the pleadings under N.D.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(vi).” We cannot do that in this case, because the State submitted, and the district court relied on, matters in addition to the application.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.