Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 ND 93 - Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Kulig

Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Kulig’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2016
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on O'Leary v. Coenen · Hurt v. Freeland · Malolepszy v. Central Market, Inc. · Nelson v. Gillette · Buri v. Ramsey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ Willfull and wanton misconduct’ requires knowledge of a situation requiring the exercise of ordinary care and diligence to avert injury to another; an ability to avoid the resulting harm by ordinary care and diligence in the means at hand; and the omission of such care and diligence to avert threatened danger when to an ordinary person it must be apparent that the result would likely prove disastrous to another. Willfull and wanton actions are reckless, heedless, malicious; characterized by extreme recklessness or foolhardiness; recklessly disregardful of the rights or safety of others or of consequences.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.