Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 ND 96 - Negaard v. Negaard

Negaard v. Negaard’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Healy v. Healy · Peters-Riemers v. Riemers · Giese v. Giese · Dietz v. Kautzman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An order or judgment finding a person guilty of contempt is a final order or judgment for purposes of appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “60 days after entry of the judgment or order being appealed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.