Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 NMCA 111 - State v. Lente

State v. Lente’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
February 2023
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2023

21 state decisions

90200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · Kumho Tire Company, Ltd., et al. v. Patrick Carmichael, Etc., et al. · State v. Torres · State v. Woodward · State v. Varela

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “New Mexico law requires only that the trial court establish the reliability of scientific knowledge, and does not apply the Daubert-Alberico standard to all expert testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A [district] court abuses its discretion when it exercises its discretion based on a misunderstanding of the law.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.