Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 NMCA 135 - State v. Flores

State v. Flores’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
August 2015
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Ring v. Arizona · Drope v. Missouri · State v. Attaway · State v. Parish

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] person whose mental condition is such that he lacks the capacity to understand the nature and object of the proceedings against him, to consult with counsel, and to assist in preparing his defense may not be subjected to a trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Instead, a defendant could offer an affidavit from someone who has observed the defendant and formulated an opinion about his or her competency, such as a corrections officer or defense counsel's paralegal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a court may consider defense counsel's observations and opinions, . . . those observations and opinions alone cannot trigger reasonable doubt about the defendant's competency.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.