Crane v. Nuttle’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “see how the accident could have happened”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Walker v. Ison Transportation Services, Inc. · CHICOINE v. SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL

2. “Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror shall not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the course of the jury's deliberations or as to the effect of anything upon the juror's mind or another juror's mind or emotions as influencing the juror to assent to or dissent from the verdict or indictment or concerning the juror's mental processes during deliberations. A juror may testify on the question whether extraneous prejudicial information was improperly brought to the jury's attention or whether any outside influence was improperly brought to bear upon any juror. An affidavit or evidence of any statement by the juror concerning a matter about which the juror would be precluded from testifying shall not be received for these purposes.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. CHICOINE v. SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL

3. “determined the accident could not have happened the way the plaintiff said it did. The Crane Court found the affidavit alleged all the nee-essary elements under § 2606(B) and held the trial court abused its discretion when it did not”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Walker v. Ison Transportation Services, Inc.