2005 Pa. Super. 119 - Commonwealth v. Long’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sheppard v. Maxwell · Pell v. Procunier · Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia · Press-Enterprise Company v. Superior Court of California Riverside County · Globe Newspaper Company v. Superior Court for County of Norfolk
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“whether a list containing empanelled jurors’ names and addresses is a public judicial document subject to a common law right of access.” Id., at 1275. In finding that the list in issue was not a judicial document, the Superior Court noted, with respect to the judicial nature of the document, that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Whether the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, Article I, Section 11 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, and/or the common law provide a right of access to the names and addresses of impaneled jurors in a criminal case?”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Commonwealth v. Long
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.