Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 Pa. Super. 162 - Rhoades v. Pryce

2005 Pa. Super. 162 - Rhoades v. Pryce’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
3
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently May 2023

15 state decisions

150200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Delbridge · 378 Pa. Super. 474 - Sonder v. Sonder · 383 Pa. Super. 374 - Goodman v. Goodman · 342 Pa. Super. 405 - McManus v. Chubb Group of Insurance · 243 Pa. Super. 349 - Crislip v. Harshman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[a]n appeal may be taken only from a final- order, unless otherwise permitted by rule or statute.” Hoffman v. Knight, 823 A.2d 202, 205 (Pa.Super.2003); Pa.R.A.P. 341(a), 42 Pa.C.S.A. Generally, an order finding a party in contempt is interlocutory and not appealable unless it imposes sanctions. Wolanin v. Hashagen, 829 A.2d 331, 332 (Pa.Super.2003).”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Sanctions for civil contempt can be imposed for one or both of two purposes: to compel or coerce obedience to a court order and/or to compensate the contemnor’s adversary for injuries resulting from the contemnor's noncompliance with a court order.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “separate and apart from the statutory provision for [attorney's] fees under 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 2503(7).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.