Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 Pa. Super. 170 - Commonwealth v. Walker

2005 Pa. Super. 170 - Commonwealth v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently May 2021

10 state decisions

40200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Banks · Commonwealth v. DeMichel · Broussard v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of City of Pittsburgh · Commonwealth v. Boczkowski · Commonwealth v. Dial

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(A)A law enforcement officer executing a search warrant shall, before entry, give, or make reasonable effort to give, notice of the officer’s identity, authority, and purpose to any occupant of the premises specified in the warrant, unless, exigent circumstances require the officer’s immediate forcible entry. [8] (B) Such officer shall await a response for a reasonable period of time after this announcement of identity, authority, and purpose, unless exigent circumstances require the officer’s immediate forcible entry. (C) If the officer is not admitted after such reasonable period, the officer may forcibly enter the premises and may use as much physical force to effect entry therein as is necessary to execute the search.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.