Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 Pa. Super. 178 - In re: J.R.

2005 Pa. Super. 178 - In re: J.R.’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Lowry · In Re Tameka M. · 456 Pa. Super. 440 - In Re Griffin · Commonwealth v. Meade · In re T.R.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “requiring] that a juvenile court consider the alternatives presented to address the needs of a dependent child; then, if two equally effective alternatives are available, the court must choose the one that is less costly to the child welfare agency.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.