2005 Pa. Super. 213 - Jones v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 2020
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Millili v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing · Commonwealth v. Lord · Commonwealth Ex Rel. Robinson v. Robinson · 2000 Pa. Super. 117 - McKeeman v. Corestates Bank, N.A. · Commonwealth v. Dowling
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rule 2119. Argument (a) General rule. The argument shall be divided into as many parts as there are questions to be argued; and shall have at the head of each part — in distinctive type or in type distinctively displayed — the particular point treated therein, followed by such discussion and citation of authorities as are deemed pertinent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Rule 2119 contains mandatory provisions regarding the contents of briefs. We have held consistently, “arguments that are not appropriately developed are waived.” It is the appellant who has the burden of establishing [her] entitlement to relief by showing that the ruling of the trial court is erroneous under the evidence or the law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“It [is] well settled that a failure to argue and to cite any authority supporting any argument constitutes a waiver of issues on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.