2005 Pa. Super. 226 - O'Gwynn v. Hebert’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2007
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738A
Relies on Thompson v. Thompson · State Ex Rel. D.S.K. v. Kasper · 412 Pa. Super. 247 - Merman v. Merman · Lang v. Lang · In Re Adoption of N.M.B.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“it is in the best interest of the child that a court of this Commonwealth assume jurisdiction because: (i) the child and his parents, or the child and at least one contestant, have a significant connection with this Commonwealth; and (ii) there is available in this Commonwealth substantial evidence concerning the present or future care, protection, training and personal relationships of the child;”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.