2005 Pa. Super. 326 - Hadar v. Avco Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Carrender v. Fitterer · 320 Pa. Super. 444 - Burch v. Sears, Roebuck and Co. · Howell v. Clyde · 376 Pa. Super. 220 - Ellis v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. · Continental Insurance v. Schneider, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If, despite the inapplicability of the [assumption of the risk] doctrine, the plaintiff's negligence contributed to the sustaining of injury, the apportionment of responsibility will follow naturally under comparative negligence law and the defendant will be relieved of responsibility commensurately, if not altogether.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the same risk of injury that was appreciated and assumed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.