2005 Pa. Super. 356 - Commonwealth v. Clark’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently October 2024
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Martin v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole · 440 Pa. Super. 380 - Commonwealth v. Miller · 2004 Pa. Super. 77 - Commonwealth v. Smith · Commonwealth v. Davis · 2005 Pa. Super. 150 - Commonwealth v. Newton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) Credit against the maximum term and any minimum term shall be given to the defendant for all time spent in custody as a result of the criminal charge for which a prison sentence is imposed or as a result of the conduct on which such a charge is based. Credit shall include credit for time spent in custody prior to trial, during trial, pending sentence, and pending the resolution of an áppeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“receive credit for all incarceration served before sentencing for which he is being detained in custody.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. Murray
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.