2005 Pa. Super. 359 - Weaver v. Harpster’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
July 2009
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Geary v. United States Steel Corp. · Clay v. Advanced Computer Applications, Inc. · 388 Pa. Super. 400 - Field v. Philadelphia Electric Co. · Shick v. Shirey · Mamlin v. Genoe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is only when a given policy is so obviously for or against the public health, safety, morals or welfare that there is a virtual unanimity of opinion in regard to it, that a court may constitute itself the voice of the community in so declaring. There must be a positive, well-defined, universal public sentiment, deeply integrated in the customs and beliefs of the people and in their conviction of what is just and right and in the interests of the public weal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“All courts shall be open; and every man for an injury done him in his lands, goods person or reputation shall have remedy by due course of law; and right and justice administered without sale, denial or delay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Weaver v. Harpster
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.