2005 Pa. Super. 374 - Grimminger v. Maitra’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 334 Pa. Super. 295 - Agriss v. Roadway Express, Inc. · In Re the June 1979 Allegheny County Investigating Grand Jury · 379 Pa. Super. 150 - Moses v. McWilliams · 416 Pa. Super. 310 - Miller Oral Surgery, Inc. v. Dinello · 2004 Pa. Super. 180 - Jones v. Faust
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Our scope of review of a trial court’s order disposing of a motion for summary judgment is plenary. Accordingly, we must consider the order in the context of the entire record. Our standard of review is the same as that of the trial court; thus, we determine whether the record documents a question of material fact concerning an element of the claim or defense at issue. If no such question appears, the court must then determine whether the moving party is entitled to judgment on the basis of substantive law. Conversely, if a question of material fact is apparent, the court must defer the question for consideration of a jury and deny the motion for summary judgment. We will reverse the resulting order only where it is established that the court committed an error of law or clearly abused its discretion.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.