2005 Pa. Super. 404 - Everett v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Fuentes v. Shevin · 404 Pa. Super. 238 - Sands v. Andino · 400 Pa. Super. 590 - Choplosky v. Choplosky · 435 Pa. Super. 603 - Guadagnino v. Montie · 371 Pa. Super. 101 - Fatemi v. Fatemi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Both notice and an opportunity to be heard must be afforded at a meaningful time in a meaningful manner . As previous panels have explained: notice in our adversarial process, ensures that each party is provided adequate opportunity to prepare and thereafter advocate its position, ultimately exposing all relevant factors from which the finder of fact may make an informed judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. S.T. v. R.W.“Formal notice and an opportunity to be heard are fundamental components of due process when a person may be deprived in a legal proceeding of a liberty interest, such as physical freedom, or a parent's custody of her child .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. S.T. v. R.W.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.