2005 Pa. Super. 407 - Commonwealth v. Anderson’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Delaware v. Prouse · Stickel v. Ohio Casualty Co. · Cera-Gonzalez v. United States · Commonwealth v. Whitmyer · Commonwealth v. Huggins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[plrobable cause does not require certainty, but rather exists when criminality is one reasonable inferences, not necessarily even the most likely inference.”) 3 . Unlike the Ohio statute cited above, the New York statute permitted fresh pursuit into New York and an arrest for any crime committed in”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“this Court continues to review the numerous fact patterns in traffic stop cases largely by comparing the fact pattern of one case to the fact pattern of another case, which frequently leads to blurry analysis and inconsistent decisions”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“review the activity alleged in light of the statutes involved, so we can reach more reliable results”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.