2005 Pa. Super. 9 - Commonwealth v. Evans’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blakely v. Washington · In re Jones · Commonwealth v. Albrecht · Commonwealth v. Stair · Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. DeMesquita
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not required to consider, nor shall we, whether [a petitioner] ... is indigent”). Because”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.