Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 SD 112 - Wald, Inc. v. Stanley

Wald, Inc. v. Stanley’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
1
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably In Re South Dakota Microsoft Antitrust Litigation (2005), Toft v. Toft (2006)

27 state decisions

150200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chem-Age Industries, Inc. v. Glover · Arneson v. Arneson · Lytle v. Morgan · Crisman v. Determan Chiropractic, Inc. · Matter of Estate of O'Keefe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a fundamental error of judgment, a choice outside the reasonable range of permissible choices, a decision, which, on full consideration is arbitrary or unreasonable.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"Abuse of discretion is the most deferential standard of review available with the exception of no review at all." "We determine that an abuse of discretion occurred only if no judicial mind, in view of the law and the circumstances of the particular case, could reasonably have reached such a conclusion." An abuse of discretion is "a fundamental error of judgment, a choice outside the reasonable range of permissible choices, a decision, which, on full consideration, is arbitrary or unreasonable."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Abuse of discretion is the most deferential standard of review available with the exception of no review at all.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.