Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2005 SD 16 - State v. Carothers

State v. Carothers’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
6
states following
November 2022
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently November 2022 · most notably State v. Pierre (2006), State v. McKinney (2005)

26 state decisions

110200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Crawford v. Washington · Ohio v. Roberts · California v. Green · People v. Johnson · People v. Green

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Crawford did not suggest that a prior opportunity for cross-examination was ... required if the witness was available for cross-examination at trial.'' (Emphasis added.) We concluded that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.