Denoyer v. Weber’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently October 2024
1 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Johnson v. Zerbst · Kimmelman v. Morrison · United States v. Easter · Foster v. Al Lockhart a Foster
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As a general matter, habeas corpus is used to review only: (1) whether the court has jurisdiction of the crime and the person of the defendant; (2) whether the sentence was authorized by law; and (3) whether, in certain cases, a defendant was deprived of basic constitutional rights.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Guthrie v. Weber“trial counsel's errors were so serious that [counsel] was not functioning as counsel guaranteed by the Constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Guthrie v. Weber“strong presumption that counsel's performance falls within the wide range of professional assistance,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Miller v. Young
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.